Can a CD be used as evidence in a criminal case?

In recent criminal cases, the prosecution has given the defense compact discs (CDs), supposed copies of audio recordings which the prosecution intends to use in evidence. In the instances when the original recordings were made on analog cassettes, an important legal question arises: Are the digital CDs true copies of original evidence?

What was the case against digitally recorded evidence?

In United States v. Edward Whipple, a federal case in Philadelphia, the same soundtrack section appeared twice on a single tape. In many other cases, deliberate stops and starts made by the technical recording transfer operator have been detected.

Can a sound recording be admissible in evidence?

Sound recordings of relevant events are admissible in evidence as long as a proper foundation is laid.

Why are audio recordings used in criminal trials?

To keep everyone honest and to avoid questions of authenticity of evidence at trial, I believe audio recordings introduced into evidence should continue to be made via the tamper-resistant analog audio cassette.

How to overcome objections to video and audio evidence?

Assuming proper foundation and authentication, such an instruction will frequently overcome most objections without diminishing the effectiveness of the evidence. A certain activity was recorded by the operator. The operator was in all respects qualified to do the recording. The speakers on the tape are identified.