What can I say instead of assumed?
What can I say instead of assumed?
conjecture,
What does it mean when someone is assumed?
: having or showing the attitude of someone who assumes something that should not be assumed : pretentious, presumptuous … I caught him boasting … about how popular he had become.
Is it assume or presume?
Although presume and assume both mean “to take something as true,” “presume” implies more confidence or evidence backed reasoning. ‘Presume’ is the word to use if you’re making an informed guess based on reasonable evidence. If you’re making a guess based on little or no evidence, the word to use is ‘assume’.
What is a good sentence for assume?
I assumed he was coming, so I was surprised when he didn’t show up. She assumed from his expression that he was confused. We’ll be arriving around noon. That’s assuming that our flight is on time.
What is it called when you make an assumption?
premise. (also premiss), presumption, presupposition, supposition.
What’s a word for someone who assumes?
“Presumptuous”is a word to describe a person who always assumes things.
What does I can only assume mean?
From Longman Dictionary of Contemporary EnglishI can only think/suppose/assume (that)I can only think/suppose/assume (that)spoken used when you are giving a reason for something, to say that you do not know something for certain but think that this is the only possible reason I can only assume that it was a mistake.
How do you identify assumptions?
One of the most reliable ways to find assumptions is to look for shifts in language between the premises and conclusion of an argument. When new stuff appears in the conclusion that wasn’t discussed in the premises, it usually got there by way of an assumption.
Are there any questions about the relation between reason and action?
For there seem to be at least three distinct questions about the relation between reasons and actions. There are questions about whether there is a reason that favours someone’s action; questions about what reason motivates someone to act; and also questions about what reasons explain his action.
Are there any questions that ask for reasons?
Questions that ask for reasons, and in particular, reasons for action, are among the commonest questions humans have. Philosophers have sought to understand the nature of such reasons.
Which is the correct definition of motivating reason?
“Motivating reason” in Dancy’s pen means the agent’s reason, the (believed, putative) fact in light of which the agent acted. Smith, however, uses “the agent’s normative reason” to refer to this and “motivating reason” to refer to the desire/belief combination necessary to explain behavior teleologically.
Which is correct assume or would just assume?
It should be pointed out that in some contexts, the verb assume properly follows the modal verb would, as in “I would just assume [=think, suppose] the opposite” or “I would assume that he’d be joining us.”
Is there a proof for the principle of sufficient reason?
Insofar as the PSR stipulates that all things must be explainable, it seems that the PSR itself demands an explanation. Several modern philosophers attempted to provide a proof for the PSR, though so far these attempts have been mostly unsuccessful.
Which is an unrestricted form of the principle of sufficient reason?
If you accept an unrestricted form of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (= PSR), you will require an explanation for any fact, or in other words, you will reject the possibility of any brute, or unexplainable, facts. A simple formulation of the principle is as follows:
For there seem to be at least three distinct questions about the relation between reasons and actions. There are questions about whether there is a reason that favours someone’s action; questions about what reason motivates someone to act; and also questions about what reasons explain his action.