What kind of issues does the ACLU work on?
What kind of issues does the ACLU work on?
[ACLU] takes on issues that can affect a large number of people directly or involving a small number of people or an individual that could set a precedent that would impact a significant number of people. We are especially interested in issues that may break new ground in interpreting constitutional rights.
Is the ACLU going to stop supporting controversial speakers?
If controversial speakers intend to carry weapons, the ACLU “will generally not represent them.” The memo’s authors assert that this does not amount to a formal change in policy, and is merely intended as guidelines that will assist ACLU affiliates in deciding which cases to take.
What was the memo from the ACLU about?
The memo’s authors assert that this does not amount to a formal change in policy, and is merely intended as guidelines that will assist ACLU affiliates in deciding which cases to take. Kaminer, though, sees the memo as yet more evidence that the ACLU “has already lost its zeal for vigorously defending the speech it hates.”
How often does the ACLU of Oklahoma take cases?
Because of the nature of civil liberties claims, only rarely does the ACLU of Oklahoma take a case that does not involve the action or inaction by a governmental entity. If you would like to find out more about what kind of cases the ACLU will take, please see the national ACLU website.
How often does the ACLU go to court?
In the courts. For nearly one hundred years, ACLU lawyers have been at the center of one history-making court case after another, participating in more Supreme Court cases than any other private organization. With attorneys nationwide, we handle thousands of cases each year on behalf of clients whose rights have…
Is the ACLU free to change its position?
Kaminer notes that the ACLU is of course free to change its position on free speech—but it should own up to this evolution: All this is the ACLU’s prerogative. Organizations are entitled to revise their values and missions.
If controversial speakers intend to carry weapons, the ACLU “will generally not represent them.” The memo’s authors assert that this does not amount to a formal change in policy, and is merely intended as guidelines that will assist ACLU affiliates in deciding which cases to take.
The memo’s authors assert that this does not amount to a formal change in policy, and is merely intended as guidelines that will assist ACLU affiliates in deciding which cases to take. Kaminer, though, sees the memo as yet more evidence that the ACLU “has already lost its zeal for vigorously defending the speech it hates.”